Disciplined leaders must be able to consistently make decisions that are clear-headed, informed, and conclusive. Their response to difficult and stressful situations is thoughtful and purposeful, never random or subjective, particularly in emotionally charged situations. Objectives are communicated clearly and unambiguously. This is not always an easy thing to do, which is why self-discipline has such a profound impact on those around us. To borrow (and modify) a quote from the world of sports… “Adversity doesn’t build character, it reveals it.” A firm, definite, and decisive leader demonstrates grace under pressure, very clearly reinforcing the perception that he or she is in complete control (of both the situation and his/her own emotions).
While disciplined leaders are by necessity decisive, they must at the same time exercise sound judgment. Emotions run high in times of crisis. Most people intuitively look for someone to “do something” in emergencies. It requires great discipline to think before responding. Any situation that requires action, whether a crisis, conflict, or everyday business decision, necessitates a thoughtful and measured response from a leader. Knowledge and experience are necessary, even crucial. But like a sword, they are only as effective as the person wielding them.
Leaders can, and should be, flexible when appropriate. However, it is one thing to compromise on matters of preference, it is quite another to compromise on matters of principle. Principles are rooted in personal doctrine or institutional values, and are a specific basis for conduct or management. Preferences are simply a matter of who controls non-essentials, and are driven by experience and familiarity.
It is one thing to compromise on matters of preference, it is quite another to compromise on matters of principle.
Strong, disciplined leaders understand this difference. Unfortunately, in a world where the boundaries of morality and ethics are deemed malleable and subject to individual interpretation, the concept of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ becomes driven by convenience and preference, lacking any principled bearing. As a consequence, the line between principle and preference is grayed. Principles are compromised for sake of appeasement or through capitulation to the path of least resistance.
It takes courage to draw a line in the sand, to stand up for what you believe. Some consider this to be close-minded or prejudicial, even intolerant. One thing is for sure. Those in positions of influence weaken themselves as leaders whenever they compromise their principles. Whether in the business world or politics, it is rare to find everyone in agreement. This is not to say that leaders shouldn’t be appropriately questioned. Convictions that can’t be reasonably defended should be rightfully challenged.
In a world where the boundaries of morality and ethics are deemed malleable and subject to individual interpretation, the concept of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ becomes driven by convenience and preference, lacking any principled bearing.
Values vary and people come to different conclusions and form different beliefs. It requires strength of conviction and great discipline to stay the course when faced with temptation to concede or compromise principles. However, people are far more willing to follow a principled and disciplined leader, even one with whom they disagree. By contrast, no one will follow a leader they don’t trust or in whom they have no faith, leaders who fail to be true to themselves and the principles on which they claim to stand.